Fusion Energy Just Got a Lot More Real. Here's the 2026 Progress Report
SPARC, the private fusion reactor racing to prove commercial fusion works, is now about 75% built in Massachusetts. It's still a machine that hasn't produced plasma yet — but it's no longer just a rendering, either.
Part 2 of 4 in Fusion 101, our plain-English series

Illustration: FrontierTech.news
Fusion power has been "thirty years away" for so long it became a running joke in energy circles. That joke is starting to look dated. In Devens, Massachusetts, a private fusion reactor called SPARC is now roughly three-quarters built — a real machine, mid-assembly, not a rendering in a pitch deck.
What SPARC actually is
SPARC is a compact tokamak built by Commonwealth Fusion Systems, a company spun out of MIT. Its defining bet is high-temperature superconductor magnets, which allow a much smaller and, in theory, cheaper reactor than older tokamak designs like the international ITER project — the core wager being that a smaller machine can prove the same physics without the multi-decade, multi-national construction timeline that's defined fusion research for generations.
The construction milestone
As of April 2026, Commonwealth Fusion Systems describes the facility as "about three quarters of the work to build SPARC" complete, spanning engineering, procurement, manufacturing, and assembly. Both halves of the reactor's vacuum vessel are now installed in the tokamak hall, along with two of the eighteen toroidal field magnets positioned on temporary assembly stands, and supporting infrastructure — the cryogenic plant, the RF building for plasma heating, and power systems — is already operational. What's left is exactly the hard, unglamorous part: measuring, cleaning, wiring, and eventually welding the vessel halves together before the machine can attempt to hold plasma at all.
The target that matters
Commonwealth Fusion Systems is targeting net fusion energy — the reactor producing more energy than it consumes — in 2027. The company is careful to frame this as a target, not a guarantee, and it's worth being precise about what it would actually prove: a physics milestone at the reactor level, not a commercially operating power plant delivering electricity to a grid at a competitive price. Those are two different and separately hard problems.
What's left is exactly the hard, unglamorous part: measuring, cleaning, wiring, and eventually welding the vessel halves together before the machine can attempt to hold plasma at all.
Enjoying this?
Get one weekly email summarizing the developments that actually matter across AI, energy, biotech, space, blockchain, and climate technology.
Newsletter Coming SoonReal money is now behind it
This isn't purely a research project anymore. Energy company Eni signed a $1 billion offtake agreement in 2025 to purchase power from ARC, Commonwealth Fusion's planned commercial follow-on plant in Virginia — a real commercial commitment tied to a specific future facility, not just research funding. That kind of agreement is a meaningfully different signal than another grant or venture round: a large energy company is willing to contract for fusion power years before that power plant exists.
How this fits alongside the rest of the grid story
Fusion is a longer-horizon bet than either of the other two big power stories reshaping the grid right now: the small modular reactors racing toward the early 2030s, and the record-setting battery storage buildout already solving reliability problems today. If SPARC hits its 2027 target and ARC eventually follows, fusion offers something neither of those technologies does on its own: enormous baseload power without the long-lived radioactive waste of fission. That "if," at this stage, is still doing a lot of work — but for the first time in a long time, it's an "if" attached to a machine that's actually three-quarters built.
Go Deeper
Frequently Asked Questions
How close is SPARC to being finished?
Commonwealth Fusion Systems reported SPARC was about 75% complete as of April 2026, with both halves of the vacuum vessel installed and supporting infrastructure like the cryogenic plant and RF building already operational. Final vessel assembly and commissioning are still ahead.
What does 'net fusion energy' actually mean?
It means the reactor produces more energy than it consumes to operate — a physics milestone at the machine level, distinct from a commercial power plant delivering competitively priced electricity to a grid. SPARC is targeting this milestone in 2027.
Is there real commercial interest in fusion power yet, or is it still just research?
Both. Energy company Eni signed a $1 billion offtake agreement in 2025 to purchase power from Commonwealth Fusion's planned ARC commercial plant in Virginia, a real contractual commitment years ahead of that plant's existence.
How does fusion compare to small modular reactors and battery storage as grid solutions?
They operate on different timelines. Battery storage is solving grid reliability problems today, SMRs are targeting the early 2030s, and fusion — if SPARC's 2027 net-energy target and a subsequent commercial plant succeed — is a longer-horizon bet offering large-scale baseload power without long-lived radioactive waste.